 | EBF 21517: 15.7 SP102 - 64 Bit | 15.7 | 26 Jul 2013 | EBF/Patch | |
| EBF 21202: 15.7 SP50 - 64 Bit | 15.7 | 23 Jul 2013 | EBF/Patch |
Why is there are SPXX (5x and soon 6x) and a SPXXX (10x) series of ebfs? There doesn't seem to be a clear indication. I'm leaning towards the idea of whomever thought that numbering scheme up was up to something devious